Report
Table of Contents
| Name of Teacher | Leong Wing Lup, Ben | ||
| Academic Year/Sem | 2017/2018 - SEM 3 | ||
| Department | COMPUTER SCIENCE | ||
| Faculty | SCHOOL OF COMPUTING | ||
| Raters | Student |
|---|---|
| Responded | 126 |
| Invited | 229 |
| Response Ratio | 55% |
The analysis is done by taking into consideration all responses from modules taught by you. This section of the report graphically represents how often particular attributes are identified in the freeform response data, and are displayed as a percentage of the number of response received. The frequency table displays the top five attributes from all the freeform comments categorized by the dictionary. We recommend that you pay attention to those attributes above 10% points.
| Attributes [No. of comments] | Overall [81] |
|---|---|
| INTERESTING | 25 % |
| ENGAGING | 22 % |
| IMPORTANT / RELEVANT | 16 % |
| HELPFUL / SUPPORTIVE | 15 % |
| ENTHUSIASTIC / DEDICATED | 12 % |
| Attributes [No. of comments] | Strongly Agree [65] | Agree [14] | Disagree [1] | Strongly Disagree [1] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INTERESTING | 25 % | 29 % | 0 % | 0 % |
| ENGAGING | 22 % | 29 % | 0 % | 0 % |
| IMPORTANT / RELEVANT | 15 % | 21 % | 0 % | 0 % |
| HELPFUL / SUPPORTIVE | 17 % | 7 % | 0 % | 0 % |
| ENTHUSIASTIC / DEDICATED | 15 % | 0 % | 0 % | 0 % |
| Attributes [No. of comments] | F [23] | M [58] |
|---|---|---|
| INTERESTING | 43 % | 17 % |
| ENGAGING | 30 % | 19 % |
| IMPORTANT / RELEVANT | 22 % | 14 % |
| HELPFUL / SUPPORTIVE | 26 % | 10 % |
| ENTHUSIASTIC / DEDICATED | 26 % | 7 % |
Listed below are the top 5 attributes voiced as positive aspects about all teachers in the department.
| Attributes [No. of comments] | Teacher Average [81] | Department Average [98] | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| INTERESTING | 25 % | 21 % | 3 % |
| ENGAGING | 22 % | 19 % | 3 % |
| IMPORTANT / RELEVANT | 16 % | 18 % | -2 % |
| HELPFUL / SUPPORTIVE | 15 % | 14 % | 1 % |
| ENTHUSIASTIC / DEDICATED | 12 % | 14 % | -2 % |
| Attributes [No. of comments] | Strongly Agree [65] | Agree [14] | Disagree [1] | Strongly Disagree [1] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INTERESTING | 25 % | 29 % | 0 % | 0 % |
| ENGAGING | 22 % | 29 % | 0 % | 0 % |
| IMPORTANT / RELEVANT | 15 % | 21 % | 0 % | 0 % |
| HELPFUL / SUPPORTIVE | 17 % | 7 % | 0 % | 0 % |
| ENTHUSIASTIC / DEDICATED | 15 % | 0 % | 0 % | 0 % |
Listed below are the top 5 attributes voiced as negative aspects about all teachers in the department.
| Attributes [No. of comments] | Teacher Average [61] | Department Average [71] | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| KIND / PERSONABLE | 7 % | 6 % | 1 % |
| KNOWLEDGEABLE | 3 % | 3 % | 0 % |
| HELPFUL / SUPPORTIVE | 3 % | 3 % | 0 % |
| CLEAR | 3 % | 3 % | 0 % |
| COMPREHENSIVE | 2 % | 1 % | 0 % |
Extensive data analysis across institutions that use student feedback have highlighted six items to which teachers may need to pay attention to.
| Potential issues [No. of comments] | Overall [61] |
|---|---|
| QUANTITY | 41 % |
| PACE | 16 % |
| TIME_ISSUES | 5 % |
| VOICE ISSUES | 2 % |
| WORKLOAD | 2 % |
| MEMORIZATION | 0 % |
