| Faculty: | SCHOOL OF COMPUTING | Academic Year: | 2006/2007 |
| Department: | COMPUTER SCIENCE | Semester: | 2 |
| Module: | FOUNDATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE - CS3243 |
| Note: | Feedback on module in general |
| Qn | Items Evaluated | Module Avg Score | Nos Responded |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overall opinion of the module. | 4.162 | 37 |
| 2 | Grade likely to get for the module. | 4.056 | 36 |
| 3 | Difficulty level of the module. | 3.757 | 37 |
QN\SCORE | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
Qn 1: Overall opinion of the module. | Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | Poor |
Qn 2: Grade likely to get for the module. | A | B | C | D | F |
Qn 3: Difficulty level of the module. | Very Difficult | Difficult | Average | Easy | Very Easy |
| Nos. of Respondents(% of Respondents) |
| | | ||||||
ITEM\SCORE | | | Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | Poor |
| | | ||||||
Module | | | 13 (35.14%) | 18 (48.65%) | 5 (13.51%) | 1 (2.70%) | 0 (.00%) |
Module at Same Level (Dept) | | | 82 (15.36%) | 224 (41.95%) | 181 (33.90%) | 31 (5.81%) | 16 (3.00%) |
Module at Same Level (Fac) | | | 130 (13.46%) | 427 (44.20%) | 339 (35.09%) | 44 (4.55%) | 26 (2.69%) |
| Nos. of Respondents(% of Respondents) |
| | | ||||||
ITEM\SCORE | | | A | B | C | D | F |
| | | ||||||
Module | | | 8 (22.22%) | 22 (61.11%) | 6 (16.67%) | 0 (.00%) | 0 (.00%) |
Module at Same Level (Dept) | | | 116 (22.05%) | 300 (57.03%) | 87 (16.54%) | 18 (3.42%) | 5 (.95%) |
Module at Same Level (Fac) | | | 196 (20.52%) | 548 (57.38%) | 178 (18.64%) | 27 (2.83%) | 6 (.63%) |
| Nos. of Respondents(% of Respondents) |
| | | ||||||
ITEM\SCORE | | | Very Difficult | Difficult | Average | Easy | Very Easy |
| | | ||||||
Module | | | 6 (16.22%) | 18 (48.65%) | 11 (29.73%) | 2 (5.41%) | 0 (.00%) |
Module at Same Level (Dept) | | | 109 (20.37%) | 269 (50.28%) | 145 (27.10%) | 11 (2.06%) | 1 (.19%) |
Module at Same Level (Fac) | | | 192 (19.86%) | 416 (43.02%) | 330 (34.13%) | 28 (2.90%) | 1 (.10%) |
| Q1. | Please comment on the strengths and weaknesses of the module, and suggest possible improvements. |
| 1. | Too much implementation and too much CA |
| 2. | excellent module.. excellently taught and handled |
| 3. | Interesting but difficult module |
| 4. | the projects are really interesting. if only i can cope with the 2nd one :( |
| 5. | Easy module. |
| 6. | This is a very interesting module. I would like to have a summary or discussion after each project so that we can know the approaches of other groups. The guest lectures are interesting, and the speakers are very good. |
| 7. | First part of module rather boring. |
| 8. | The module introduces artificial intelligence in a way that a wide variety of concepts are thrown at students. This is a good thing provided concepts can be fully understood in lecture. |
| 9. | Strengths: Ben Leong. Weakness: The guy at SOC who ask him to teach. He is a Computer Networking specialist for God's sake. Come on lah, surely, SOC can do better. |
| 10. | Very Interesting module.. esp for Projects.... Things taught in this module seem to be quite basic and intuitive too.. |
| 11. | The module touches very lightly on various aspects of AI. The project-based approach makes the module very interesting and is a refreshing change from the monotony of lectures and tutorials only. |
| 12. | Ben Leong should not be teaching AI at all since he does networking and not AI. |
| 13. | this module is interesting and gave me an introducion on how to make machines think |