STUDENTS' RATINGS ON TEACHER

Faculty Member:  LEONG WING LUP, BEN
Department:  COMPUTER SCIENCE Academic Year:  2011/2012
Faculty:  SCHOOL OF COMPUTING Semester:  2
Module:SOFTWARE ENGINEERING ON MODERN APPLICATION PLATFORMS - CS3217
Activity Type:LECTURE
Class Size/Response Size/Response Rate/Contact Session/Teaching Hour :27  /  17  /  62.96%  /  12  /  18
QnItems EvaluatedFac. Member Avg ScoreFac. Member Avg Score Std. DevDept Avg ScoreFac. Avg Score
(a)     (b)(c)     (d)






1The teacher has enhanced my thinking ability. 4.882 0.081 4.157 ( 4.255) 4.073 ( 4.046)
2The teacher provides timely and useful feedback. 4.941 0.059 4.164 ( 4.292) 4.094 ( 4.089)
3The teacher is approachable for consultation. 4.882 0.081 4.229 ( 4.372) 4.167 ( 4.166)
4The teacher has helped me develop relevant research skills.*NANANANA
5The teacher has increased my interest in the subject. 4.938 0.063 4.080 ( 4.226) 4.004 ( 4.004)
6The teacher has helped me acquire valuable/relevant knowledge in the field. 4.765 0.161 4.174 ( 4.291) 4.113 ( 4.099)
7The teacher has helped me understand complex ideas. 4.706 0.206 4.124 ( 4.228) 4.038 ( 4.016)
Average of Qn 1-7** 4.851 0.100 4.151 ( 4.278) 4.078 ( 4.070)
8Overall the teacher is effective. 4.882 0.081 4.190 ( 4.293) 4.110 ( 4.080)

* This includes skills in research methodology, research problems/questions, literature search/evaluation, oral presentation and manuscript preparation.

** If Qn 4 is NA, it will not be included in the computation of average score (Average of Qn 1-7).

Frequency Distribution of responses for Qn 8

Nos. of Respondents(% of Respondents)


|






ITEM\SCORE

|

5

4

3

2

1


|






Self

|

15 (88.24%)

2 (11.76%)

0 (.00%)

0 (.00%)

0 (.00%)

Teachers teaching all Modules of the Same Activity Type (Lecture), at the same level within Department

|

213 (40.80%)

259 (49.62%)

41 (7.85%)

8 (1.53%)

1 (.19%)

Teachers teaching all Modules of the Same Activity Type (Lecture), at the same level within Faculty

|

300 (32.36%)

456 (49.19%)

132 (14.24%)

23 (2.48%)

16 (1.73%)

Note:
1. A 5-point scale is used for the scores. The higher the score, the better the rating.
2. Fac. Member Avg Score: The mean of all the scores for each question for the faculty member.
3. Fac. Member Avg Score Std. Dev: A measure of the range of variability. It measures the extent to which a faculty member's Average Score differs from all the scores in the faculty member's evaluation. The smaller the standard deviation, the greater the robustness of the number given as average.
4. Dept Avg Score :
 (a) the mean score of same activity type (Lecture) within the department.
 (b) the mean score of same activity type (Lecture), at the same module level ( level 3000 ) within the department.
5. Fac. Avg Score :
 (c) the mean score of same activity type (Lecture) within the faculty.
 (d) the mean score of same activity type (Lecture), at the same module level ( level 3000 ) within the faculty.

STUDENTS' COMMENTS ON TEACHER

Faculty Member:  LEONG WING LUP, BEN
Department:  COMPUTER SCIENCE Academic Year:  2011/2012
Faculty:  SCHOOL OF COMPUTING Semester:  2
Module:SOFTWARE ENGINEERING ON MODERN APPLICATION PLATFORMS - CS3217
Activity Type:LECTURE

Q9  What are the teacher's strengths?
1.Personable. Cares alot for the students, Constantly finding ways to maximize the learning of his students. Always jovial.
2.Committed and likes to teach(torture) students.
3.Inspiring, good common sense, humorous, handsome (Mc Donald @ Saturday night)
4.Godlike. Inspiring. Hero.
5.Prompt feedback, caring nature, likes to torture students
6.He has broad knowledge and he care about students.
7.takes good care about his student
8.Prof Ben is very clear in his explanations and teaches the course in a very practical manner. In addition, he also has the ability to push people to achieve things beyond what they think they are capable of.
9.Friendly, approachable, can build our interest, shares with us lots of his experience.
10.Teaching and inspiring students.
11.Inspire and push students to go beyond themselves.
12.- Handsome - Very considerate - Very deep thoughts - Very responsible

Q10  What improvements would you suggest to the teacher?
1.-
2.Have more CS321X classes! I want to take CS3216 but I don't think I'll get the chance to. =( DONT stop conducting nasty classes. Your students are also sadists who sign themselves up for torture, and they want MORE.
3.Sometimes talks too fast
4.N/A
5.Nothing to improve
6.nil
7.more free food :D
8.All the best for your company although I wish you could stay.
9.None.
10.Please improve on your normal lectures. You didn't explain new concept properly so that we can understand right away.

STUDENTS' RATINGS ON TEACHER

Faculty Member:  LEONG WING LUP, BEN
Department:  COMPUTER SCIENCE Academic Year:  2011/2012
Faculty:  SCHOOL OF COMPUTING Semester:  2
Module:SOFTWARE ENGINEERING ON MODERN APPLICATION PLATFORMS - CS3217
Activity Type:TUTORIAL
Class Size/Response Size/Response Rate/Contact Session/Teaching Hour :17  /  10  /  58.82%  /  12  /  12
QnItems EvaluatedFac. Member Avg ScoreFac. Member Avg Score Std. DevDept Avg ScoreFac. Avg Score
(a)     (b)(c)     (d)






1The teacher has enhanced my thinking ability. 5.000 0.000 3.983 ( 4.030) 3.953 ( 3.927)
2The teacher provides timely and useful feedback. 5.000 0.000 4.017 ( 4.065) 4.019 ( 4.013)
3The teacher is approachable for consultation. 4.900 0.100 4.094 ( 4.169) 4.092 ( 4.096)
4The teacher has helped me develop relevant research skills.*NANANANA
5The teacher has increased my interest in the subject. 4.900 0.100 3.897 ( 4.000) 3.881 ( 3.908)
6The teacher has helped me acquire valuable/relevant knowledge in the field. 4.800 0.200 3.990 ( 4.068) 3.970 ( 3.962)
7The teacher has helped me understand complex ideas. 4.800 0.200 3.998 ( 4.025) 3.964 ( 3.911)
Average of Qn 1-7** 4.900 0.071 3.997 ( 4.060) 3.980 ( 3.969)
8Overall the teacher is effective. 4.900 0.100 4.019 ( 4.073) 4.004 ( 3.985)

* This includes skills in research methodology, research problems/questions, literature search/evaluation, oral presentation and manuscript preparation.

** If Qn 4 is NA, it will not be included in the computation of average score (Average of Qn 1-7).

Frequency Distribution of responses for Qn 8

Nos. of Respondents(% of Respondents)


|






ITEM\SCORE

|

5

4

3

2

1


|






Self

|

9 (90.00%)

1 (10.00%)

0 (.00%)

0 (.00%)

0 (.00%)

Teachers teaching all Modules of the Same Activity Type (Tutorial), at the same level within Department

|

126 (31.66%)

197 (49.50%)

58 (14.57%)

12 (3.02%)

5 (1.26%)

Teachers teaching all Modules of the Same Activity Type (Tutorial), at the same level within Faculty

|

167 (27.51%)

301 (49.59%)

110 (18.12%)

21 (3.46%)

8 (1.32%)

Note:
1. A 5-point scale is used for the scores. The higher the score, the better the rating.
2. Fac. Member Avg Score: The mean of all the scores for each question for the faculty member.
3. Fac. Member Avg Score Std. Dev: A measure of the range of variability. It measures the extent to which a faculty member's Average Score differs from all the scores in the faculty member's evaluation. The smaller the standard deviation, the greater the robustness of the number given as average.
4. Dept Avg Score :
 (a) the mean score of same activity type (Tutorial) within the department.
 (b) the mean score of same activity type (Tutorial), at the same module level ( level 3000 ) within the department.
5. Fac. Avg Score :
 (c) the mean score of same activity type (Tutorial) within the faculty.
 (d) the mean score of same activity type (Tutorial), at the same module level ( level 3000 ) within the faculty.

STUDENTS' COMMENTS ON TEACHER

Faculty Member:  LEONG WING LUP, BEN
Department:  COMPUTER SCIENCE Academic Year:  2011/2012
Faculty:  SCHOOL OF COMPUTING Semester:  2
Module:SOFTWARE ENGINEERING ON MODERN APPLICATION PLATFORMS - CS3217
Activity Type:TUTORIAL

Q9  What are the teacher's strengths?
1.Inspiring, good common sense, humorous, handsome, generous (Mc Donald @ Saturday night)
2.Godlike. Inspiring. Hero.
3.As above
4.- Handsome - Very considerate - Very deep thoughts - Very responsible
5.Teaching and inspiring students

Q10  What improvements would you suggest to the teacher?
1.Sometimes talks too fast
2.N/A
3.As above
4.He cannot be better. He's the best!
5.Teach more awesome modules.

STUDENTS' NOMINATIONS FOR BEST TEACHING

Faculty Member:  LEONG WING LUP, BEN
Department:  COMPUTER SCIENCE Academic Year:  2011/2012
Faculty:  SCHOOL OF COMPUTING Semester:  2

Module Code:CS3217No of Nominations:12

1.Prof is awesome.
2.Cares alot for his students. Very passionate and often goes the extra mile to help students learn.
3.Prof Ben makes his students motivated and stretches them to their limits to let them understand that many things that look impossible to achieve are actually possible to attain IF THEY BLEED ENOUGH BLOOD. Prof Ben is dedicated and inspires his students to work hard! I owe it to him for learning so much within such a short period of time. THANKS PROF!
4.Brilliant teachers. He is inspiring and know how to light up the passion inside his students. So sad that I don't have the chance to take CS3216 next semester.
5.The best professor in SoC and the only professor who cares about actual learning rather than grades.
6.He's the best lecturer I've ever seen.
7.Prof Ben is a really capable teacher and has taught me to push myself beyond my limits. This has resulted in an improvement of my own abilities as well as give me the confidence in myself to believe that I can do good software engineering. In my four years of university life, no teacher has had a strong, substantial influence on me like what Prof Ben has done. He works very hard to do his best for his students and shows genuine interest and concern for his students. I am really grateful to have a teacher like him and I believe that he really deserves the Teaching Excellence Award.
8.Best lecture ever met. Period.