Name of Teacher Leong Wing Lup, Ben
Module FMC1206-FRESHMAN SEMINAR: COMPUTING FOR A BETTER WORLD (SEMINAR-STYLE MODULE CLASS)
Academic Year/Sem 2016/2017 - SEM 1
Department DEAN'S OFFICE (SCHOOL OF COMPUTING)
Faculty SCHOOL OF COMPUTING

Number of Responses

StatisticsValue
Response Count9


A. GUIDELINES FOR INTERPRETING THE REPORT

The teacher evaluation report is for developmental purposes and is meant to help identify strengths and areas for improvement. Please consider the following recommendations that will aid in interpreting the results:

  1. Examine the report by taking note of patterns in order to consider how best to act on the feedback your students have taken the time to provide. Use the reflection section at the end to reflect upon how you might act on the feedback.

  2. These evaluations stem from student perception and thus constitute one source of evidence among others as to the quality of your teaching. Any response to the feedback should be based on the most representative results rather than on outlying responses.

  3. Upon getting a general sense as to what has gone well, and which areas may require attention and improvement, it is important to drill down to the related questions (see the detailed report). These questions can help guide future action if feedback from students suggest areas for improvement.

  4. Keep both the likert scale and written comments in mind while reading through the report. High scores (4+) suggest student consensus indicating a strength. On the other hand, low scores (2-) should be considered as an area that requires immediate developmental focus based on student feedback.
     

B. NOMINATION FOR TEACHING AWARDS


  Response Count
I would like to nominate Leong Wing Lup, Ben for teaching awards 4

Comment
   -He is very very very responsible
   -SoC handsome prof
   -Puts in his best to simulate students' creative thinking
   -Teaches very creatively. Very knowledgeable.

C. SUMMARY OF TEACHING SCORES

(i) Teaching Rating Score Analysis

QuestionAverage Score (TEACHER)Department Average (DEAN'S OFFICE (SCHOOL OF COMPUTING))Faculty Average (SCHOOL OF COMPUTING)
MeanStandard DeviationMeanStandard DeviationMeanStandard Deviation
The teacher has enhanced my thinking ability.4.670.714.120.784.170.82
The teacher provided timely and useful feedback.4.331.124.100.804.160.85
The teacher has increased my interest in the subject.4.111.174.140.774.040.92
Average of Q1-Q34.371.014.12-4.12-

1. The teacher has enhanced my thinking ability.
Graphs illustrating the information in the accessible table that should immediately follow it.
2. The teacher provided timely and useful feedback.
Graphs illustrating the information in the accessible table that should immediately follow it.
3. The teacher has increased my interest in the subject.
Graphs illustrating the information in the accessible table that should immediately follow it.

QuestionAverage Score (TEACHER)Department Average (DEAN'S OFFICE (SCHOOL OF COMPUTING))Faculty Average (SCHOOL OF COMPUTING)
MeanMeanMean
Computed Overall Effectiveness Score4.454.164.17

(ii) Teacher Rating Analysis Based on Scale Distribution

Graphs illustrating the information in the accessible table that should immediately follow it.

(iii) Teacher Rating Frequency Analysis

1. The teacher has enhanced my thinking ability.
Graphs illustrating the information in the accessible table that should immediately follow it.
StatisticsValue
Response Count9
Mean4.67
80th Percentile5.00
Standard Deviation0.71
Positive Feedback88.89%

2. The teacher provided timely and useful feedback.
Graphs illustrating the information in the accessible table that should immediately follow it.
StatisticsValue
Response Count9
Mean4.33
80th Percentile5.00
Standard Deviation1.12
Positive Feedback77.78%

3. The teacher has increased my interest in the subject.
Graphs illustrating the information in the accessible table that should immediately follow it.
StatisticsValue
Response Count9
Mean4.11
80th Percentile5.00
Standard Deviation1.17
Positive Feedback66.67%

(iv) Teacher Rating Scores vs. Gender

QuestionMFOverall
The teacher has enhanced my thinking ability.4.505.004.67
The teacher provided timely and useful feedback.4.005.004.33
The teacher has increased my interest in the subject.4.004.334.11

D. STRENGTHS

What are Leong Wing Lup, Ben's strengths?

Comment
Caring, passionate about the subject, interesting lessons
Very useful and timely feedback. Very responsible
Prof Ben is very responsible.
Approachable
Stimulates creative thinking
Introduces real-life scenarios and good learning material
Prof Ben is knowledgeable about business. This allows him to include countless real life examples in his lecture, making his lecture interesting and understandable.
Also, he is experienced in both writing and business.

E. AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT

What improvements would you suggest to Leong Wing Lup, Ben?

Comment
NIL
Sometimes speak too quick that I cannot follow
Maybe can speak less Singlish?
I suggest that Prof Ben reduces the speed of his speech and introduces the terminologies before using them in explanations.