NUS Student Feedback - TEACHER REPORT for 1730(CS1010X-PROGRAMMING METHODOLOGY (LECTURE)) (Leong Wing Lup, Ben 018864)

TEACHER REPORT

Name of Teacher	Leong Wing Lup, Ben
Module	1730(CS1010X-PROGRAMMING METHODOLOGY (LECTURE))
Academic Year/Sem	2017/2018 - SEM 3
Department	COMPUTER SCIENCE
Faculty	SCHOOL OF COMPUTING

Raters	Student
Responded	39
Invited	53
Response Ratio	74%

Note:
Class Size = Invited; Response Size = Responded; Response Rate = Response Ratio

A. GUIDELINES FOR INTERPRETING THE REPORT

The teacher evaluation report is for developmental purposes and is meant to help identify strengths and areas for improvement. Please consider the following recommendations that will aid in interpreting the results:

Examine the report by taking note of patterns in order to consider how best to act on the feedback your students have taken the time to provide. Use the reflection section at the end to reflect upon how you might act on the feedback.
These evaluations stem from student perception and thus constitute one source of evidence among others as to the quality of your teaching. Any response to the feedback should be based on the most representative results rather than on outlying responses.
Upon getting a general sense as to what has gone well, and which areas may require attention and improvement, it is important to drill down to the related questions. These questions can help guide future action if feedback from students suggest areas for improvement.
Keep both the likert scale and written comments in mind while reading through the report. High scores (4+) suggest student consensus indicating a strength. On the other hand, low scores (2-) should be considered as an area that requires immediate developmental focus based on student feedback.

	Response Count
I would like to nominate Leong Wing Lup, Ben for teaching awards	27

Comment
-Cares about his students by giving them lots of practice papers.
-He's pretty okay
-Explains concepts clearly and able to teach in a methodical manner that is effective in getting students to understand
-Same reason as that in the recitations.
-He is the best
-His lecture are the most helpful to study and he is my favourite teacher =)
-The development of the online learning platform Coursemology, which has helped me greatly in the process of learning programming.
-A prof with a passion to teach the students, a warm heart that cares for the students, an vision to trained the students for the real-world and a determination in teaching the students all relevant theories. Best mentor anyone could ask for.
-He is very committed in his teaching, providing students with timely and effective feedback. When students approach him, he is eager to help and is quick in pointing out errors and finding possible solutions. His guidance extends outside of classroom, helping his students to find meaning in life as well. He is a well-liked and well-respected teacher.
-Not only is Prof Ben extremely passionate, he is also always constantly helping to answer students' queries on the forums. The missions that he designed are interesting and this is due to his hard work behind the scenes.
-Passionate Teacher. Makes effort to help struggling students and answers queries promptly, even at inconvenient hours
-teaching was clear and engaging, and clearly huge amount of effort was put into preparing materials for the course
-A very professional educator who puts in effort into ensuring that his students' concerns and needs are addressed effectively.
-He is a Prof who always encourage students and get down to our level and tries his best to provide help in areas students don't understand.
-Prof's teaching style is effective and greatly improves students' interest in subject.
-Evil but super kind prof! Even his evilness is for our own good!
-Overall, he is passionate about teaching and consistently help students with their questions.
-He is a passionate teacher
-He makes programming interesting and getting help and feedback easy.
-A teacher with a heart for the students. Willing to go above and beyond his teaching duty to help his students.
-Able to keep lessons fun and lively. He has shown that he is very passionate about the content of the subject.
-He's able to teach the subject effectively while making it interesting to learn.
-He is very passionate in educating new knowledge to his students Very experienced in his field of work
-Imparts not just knowledge but also give insights on how to live life
-Fun and interesting lecturer. Able to include the element of fun while teaching us programming concepts
-He is really good.
-He is able to relate well to students. Gives wise advice. Friendly and approachable.

C. SUMMARY OF TEACHING SCORES
(i) Teaching Rating Score Analysis

Question	Average Score (TEACHER)		Department Average (COMPUTER SCIENCE)		Faculty Average (SCHOOL OF COMPUTING)
Question	Mean	Standard Deviation	Mean	Standard Deviation	Mean	Standard Deviation
Overall, the teacher is effective.	4.7	0.5	4.7	0.6	4.7	0.6

Question	Average Score (TEACHER)	Dept Average by Activity & Level (COMPUTER SCIENCE-LECTURE (Level 1000))	Fac Average by Activity & Level (SCHOOL OF COMPUTING-LECTURE (Level 1000))	Dept Average by Activity (COMPUTER SCIENCE-LECTURE)	Fac Average by Activity (SCHOOL OF COMPUTING-LECTURE)
Question	Mean	Mean	Mean	Mean	Mean
Overall, the teacher is effective.	4.7	4.7	4.7	4.7	4.7

Overall, the teacher is effective

Graphs illustrating the information in the accessible table that should immediately follow it.

Question	Average Score (TEACHER)		Department Average (COMPUTER SCIENCE)		Faculty Average (SCHOOL OF COMPUTING)
Question	Mean	Standard Deviation	Mean	Standard Deviation	Mean	Standard Deviation
The teacher has enhanced my thinking ability.	4.7	0.5	4.7	0.6	4.7	0.6
The teacher provided timely and useful feedback.	4.6	0.6	4.6	0.7	4.6	0.7
The teacher has increased my interest in the subject.	4.7	0.5	4.6	0.7	4.6	0.7
Average of Q1-Q3	4.7	0.6	4.6	-	4.6	-

Question	Average Score (TEACHER)	Dept Average by Activity & Level (COMPUTER SCIENCE-LECTURE (Level 1000))	Fac Average by Activity & Level (SCHOOL OF COMPUTING-LECTURE (Level 1000))	Dept Average by Activity (COMPUTER SCIENCE-LECTURE)	Fac Average by Activity (SCHOOL OF COMPUTING-LECTURE)
Question	Mean	Mean	Mean	Mean	Mean
The teacher has enhanced my thinking ability.	4.7	4.7	4.7	4.7	4.7
The teacher provided timely and useful feedback.	4.6	4.6	4.6	4.6	4.6
The teacher has increased my interest in the subject.	4.7	4.6	4.6	4.6	4.6
Average of Q1-Q3	4.7	4.6	4.6	4.6	4.6

Department Specific Questions

Question	Average Score (TEACHER)		Department Average (COMPUTER SCIENCE)
Question	Mean	Standard Deviation	Mean	Standard Deviation
The teacher has enhanced my ability to communicate the subject material.	4.6	0.5	4.5	0.6

Question	Average Score (TEACHER)		Department Average (COMPUTER SCIENCE)
Question	Mean	Standard Deviation	Mean	Standard Deviation
The teacher's attitude and approach encouraged me to think and work in a creative and independent way.	4.7	0.5	4.6	0.6

Question	Average Score (TEACHER)		Department Average (COMPUTER SCIENCE)
Question	Mean	Standard Deviation	Mean	Standard Deviation
The teacher cares about student development and learning.	4.8	0.4	4.7	0.6

(ii) Teacher Rating Analysis Based on Scale Distribution

The teacher has enhanced my ability to communicate the subject material.

The teacher's attitude and approach encouraged me to think and work in a creative and independent way.

The teacher cares about student development and learning.

(iii) Teacher Rating Frequency Analysis

1. The teacher has enhanced my thinking ability.

Statistics	Value
Response Count	38
Mean	4.7
Median	5.0
Mode	5
80th Percentile	5.0
Standard Deviation	0.5
Positive Feedback	97%

2. The teacher provided timely and useful feedback.

Statistics	Value
Response Count	38
Mean	4.6
Median	5.0
Mode	5
80th Percentile	5.0
Standard Deviation	0.6
Positive Feedback	92%

3. The teacher has increased my interest in the subject.

Statistics	Value
Response Count	38
Mean	4.7
Median	5.0
Mode	5
80th Percentile	5.0
Standard Deviation	0.5
Positive Feedback	97%

The teacher has enhanced my ability to communicate the subject material.

Statistics	Value
Response Count	38
Mean	4.6
Median	5.0
Mode	5
80th Percentile	5.0
Standard Deviation	0.5
Positive Feedback	97%

The teacher's attitude and approach encouraged me to think and work in a creative and independent way.

Statistics	Value
Response Count	38
Mean	4.7
Median	5.0
Mode	5
80th Percentile	5.0
Standard Deviation	0.5
Positive Feedback	100%

The teacher cares about student development and learning.

Statistics	Value
Response Count	38
Mean	4.8
Median	5.0
Mode	5
80th Percentile	5.0
Standard Deviation	0.4
Positive Feedback	100%

(iv) Teacher Rating Scores vs. Gender

Question	M	F	Overall
The teacher has enhanced my thinking ability.	4.7	5.0	4.7
The teacher provided timely and useful feedback.	4.5	5.0	4.6
The teacher has increased my interest in the subject.	4.6	5.0	4.7

D. STRENGTHS

What are Leong Wing Lup, Ben's strengths?

Comments
He is very clear and precise about his teachings.
NA
Great at explaining stuff.
He gives thought provoking homework.
Very knowledgeable, great expertise, patient teacher, not at all boring, makes computer science fun
Understand students' struggles and know how to emphasise on students' ability to overcome the difficulties on their own. His lectures are always a joy to attend and he takes students' interests, well-being to heart.
Creative teaching methods and relevant practice questions
He is very engaging, committed and inspiring.
His explanations make even the most difficult questions seem easy
Very humourous
He knows the subject matter well. He is also good at telling things frankly, and not beating about the bush. Extremely fast at answering questions, even at odd hours.
Explains to students in different ways to help them understand. Constantly encouraging students to write code and guide them till they get it, even if it takes a longer way to solve it.
Very outgoing and engaging, definitely one of my favourite professors!
Apart from having the relevant skills, which i think every prof would, he is great at engaging the crowd.
He makes programming interesting and getting help and feedback easy.
Cares and looks out for his students, whether they can cope and whether they understand Explains concepts clearly and effectively Experienced prof
–
Quite clear and concise.
Prof Ben does not spoon feed information and always leaves interesting pieces of information out in lectures for students to figure out on their own. This encourages students to search for answers themselves and in doing so instills interest in the subject.
Ability to keep students engaged and motivated throughout the module. Giving the students advice on how to excel in university and helping students see beyond the grades.
Good knowledge of the subject. Able to capture the students' attention.
Passionate about teaching Experienced in his field Very hard working
teaches concepts very well. very creative in setting higher order questions. good speaker
Able to decompose complicated concepts into easier to understand contents.
He is really efficient with teaching and is very approachable.
He is able to relate well to students. Gives wise advice. Friendly and approachable.

E. AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT

What improvements would you suggest to Leong Wing Lup, Ben?

Comments
NA
He talks okay in real life, but should talk faster during the online lectures.
Talk a little slower :)
MORE RECITATIONS WITH BEN
nil
Nil
NIL
Lectures are sometimes unclear, and I have to spend quite some time trying to piece things on my own.
Maybe make his lecture videos more understandable by providing more "visualisations"? Something like using python tutor to teach!
The lecture slides need more love though.
Nil
Video lectures could be made slightly longer for a more understandable explanation
–
NA. Lectures are good
NA. I think he has done a great job. And this is my first module in NUS so I do not have much knowledge on how he can improve.
To articulate his words better when lecturing.
NIL
nil
Nil
NIL

Name of Teacher	Leong Wing Lup, Ben
Module	1730(CS1010X-PROGRAMMING METHODOLOGY (RECITATION))
Academic Year/Sem	2017/2018 - SEM 3
Department	COMPUTER SCIENCE
Faculty	SCHOOL OF COMPUTING

Raters	Student
Responded	35
Invited	52
Response Ratio	67%

Examine the report by taking note of patterns in order to consider how best to act on the feedback your students have taken the time to provide. Use the reflection section at the end to reflect upon how you might act on the feedback.
These evaluations stem from student perception and thus constitute one source of evidence among others as to the quality of your teaching. Any response to the feedback should be based on the most representative results rather than on outlying responses.
Upon getting a general sense as to what has gone well, and which areas may require attention and improvement, it is important to drill down to the related questions. These questions can help guide future action if feedback from students suggest areas for improvement.
Keep both the likert scale and written comments in mind while reading through the report. High scores (4+) suggest student consensus indicating a strength. On the other hand, low scores (2-) should be considered as an area that requires immediate developmental focus based on student feedback.

	Response Count
I would like to nominate Leong Wing Lup, Ben for teaching awards	20

Comment
-Puts in effort in ensuring that students understand the lesson
-He's able to teach with fun in learning in mind.
-The lessons are well planned along with the structure of the homework. The content feels like it is a lot but it is taught well and builds upon previous lessons well, making the course manageable. Prompt to reply to questions.
-The development of the online learning platform Coursemology, which has helped me greatly in the process of learning programming.
-A prof with a passion to teach the students, a warm heart that cares for the students, an vision to trained the students for the real-world and a determination in teaching the students all relevant theories. Best mentor anyone could ask for.
-He is very committed in his teaching, providing students with timely and effective feedback. When students approach him, he is eager to help and is quick in pointing out errors and finding possible solutions. His guidance extends outside of classroom, helping his students to find meaning in life as well. He is a well-liked and well-respected teacher.
-Stated in the previous feedback
-passionate and committed
-He is a Prof who constantly pushes students to their limit and ensure they learn skills out of a module in NUS.
-Prof's teaching style is effective and greatly improves students' interest in subject.
-He gave us a very good module
-nil
-He makes programming interesting and getting help and feedback easy.
-Awesome prof
-Able to keep lessons fun and lively. He has shown that he is very passionate about the content of the subject.
-He is very passionate in teaching and in educating new knowledge to his students. He is really hardworking and experienced in his work
-He not just teaches us cs but also talks to us about life in general and other important stuff
-Interesting style of teaching. Explicitly explains concepts fully and clearly.
-He is really good
-He is able to relate well to students. Gives wise advice. Friendly and approachable.

C. SUMMARY OF TEACHING SCORES
(i) Teaching Rating Score Analysis

Question	Average Score (TEACHER)		Department Average (COMPUTER SCIENCE)		Faculty Average (SCHOOL OF COMPUTING)
Question	Mean	Standard Deviation	Mean	Standard Deviation	Mean	Standard Deviation
Overall, the teacher is effective.	4.8	0.5	4.7	0.6	4.7	0.6

Question	Average Score (TEACHER)	Dept Average by Activity & Level (COMPUTER SCIENCE-TUTORIAL (Level 1000))	Fac Average by Activity & Level (SCHOOL OF COMPUTING-TUTORIAL (Level 1000))	Dept Average by Activity (COMPUTER SCIENCE-TUTORIAL)	Fac Average by Activity (SCHOOL OF COMPUTING-TUTORIAL)
Question	Mean	Mean	Mean	Mean	Mean
Overall, the teacher is effective.	4.8	4.7	4.7	4.7	4.7

Overall, the teacher is effective

Question	Average Score (TEACHER)		Department Average (COMPUTER SCIENCE)		Faculty Average (SCHOOL OF COMPUTING)
Question	Mean	Standard Deviation	Mean	Standard Deviation	Mean	Standard Deviation
The teacher has enhanced my thinking ability.	4.7	0.5	4.7	0.6	4.7	0.6
The teacher provided timely and useful feedback.	4.6	0.6	4.6	0.7	4.6	0.7
The teacher has increased my interest in the subject.	4.7	0.5	4.6	0.7	4.6	0.7
Average of Q1-Q3	4.7	0.5	4.6	-	4.6	-

Question	Average Score (TEACHER)	Dept Average by Activity & Level (COMPUTER SCIENCE-TUTORIAL (Level 1000))	Fac Average by Activity & Level (SCHOOL OF COMPUTING-TUTORIAL (Level 1000))	Dept Average by Activity (COMPUTER SCIENCE-TUTORIAL)	Fac Average by Activity (SCHOOL OF COMPUTING-TUTORIAL)
Question	Mean	Mean	Mean	Mean	Mean
The teacher has enhanced my thinking ability.	4.7	4.7	4.7	4.7	4.7
The teacher provided timely and useful feedback.	4.6	4.7	4.7	4.7	4.7
The teacher has increased my interest in the subject.	4.7	4.6	4.6	4.6	4.6
Average of Q1-Q3	4.7	4.6	4.6	4.6	4.6

Department Specific Questions

Question	Average Score (TEACHER)		Department Average (COMPUTER SCIENCE)
Question	Mean	Standard Deviation	Mean	Standard Deviation
The teacher has enhanced my ability to communicate the subject material.	4.6	0.6	4.5	0.6

Question	Average Score (TEACHER)		Department Average (COMPUTER SCIENCE)
Question	Mean	Standard Deviation	Mean	Standard Deviation
The teacher's attitude and approach encouraged me to think and work in a creative and independent way.	4.6	0.5	4.6	0.6

Question	Average Score (TEACHER)		Department Average (COMPUTER SCIENCE)
Question	Mean	Standard Deviation	Mean	Standard Deviation
The teacher cares about student development and learning.	4.7	0.4	4.7	0.6

(ii) Teacher Rating Analysis Based on Scale Distribution

The teacher has enhanced my ability to communicate the subject material.

The teacher's attitude and approach encouraged me to think and work in a creative and independent way.

The teacher cares about student development and learning.

(iii) Teacher Rating Frequency Analysis

1. The teacher has enhanced my thinking ability.

Statistics	Value
Response Count	35
Mean	4.7
Median	5.0
Mode	5
80th Percentile	5.0
Standard Deviation	0.5
Positive Feedback	97%

2. The teacher provided timely and useful feedback.

Statistics	Value
Response Count	35
Mean	4.6
Median	5.0
Mode	5
80th Percentile	5.0
Standard Deviation	0.6
Positive Feedback	94%

3. The teacher has increased my interest in the subject.

Statistics	Value
Response Count	35
Mean	4.7
Median	5.0
Mode	5
80th Percentile	5.0
Standard Deviation	0.5
Positive Feedback	97%

The teacher has enhanced my ability to communicate the subject material.

Statistics	Value
Response Count	35
Mean	4.6
Median	5.0
Mode	5
80th Percentile	5.0
Standard Deviation	0.6
Positive Feedback	94%

The teacher's attitude and approach encouraged me to think and work in a creative and independent way.

Statistics	Value
Response Count	35
Mean	4.6
Median	5.0
Mode	5
80th Percentile	5.0
Standard Deviation	0.5
Positive Feedback	100%

The teacher cares about student development and learning.

Statistics	Value
Response Count	35
Mean	4.7
Median	5.0
Mode	5
80th Percentile	5.0
Standard Deviation	0.4
Positive Feedback	100%

(iv) Teacher Rating Scores vs. Gender

Question	M	F	Overall
The teacher has enhanced my thinking ability.	4.7	5.0	4.7
The teacher provided timely and useful feedback.	4.6	5.0	4.6
The teacher has increased my interest in the subject.	4.7	5.0	4.7

D. STRENGTHS

What are Leong Wing Lup, Ben's strengths?

Comments
Points out important concepts to the students to learn.
He's great at explaining things.
Seems to be able to befriend the students easily.
Creative teaching methods and relevant practice questions
He is engaging, committed and inspiring
Promptly answers questions, even at odd hours. Frank about things, will tell you in the face if your approach to things is wrong.
Constantly encourages students to write code even though it takes longer but he makes sure students can understand.
A very outspoken prof!
Clear and concise with the teaching agenda, leaving time for students to pose questions. Engaging as well.
He makes programming interesting and getting help and feedback easy.
–
He is passionate about the subject + teaching, and will make the effort to communicate. Interesting sense of humour too
Ability to keep students engaged and motivated throughout the module. Giving the students advice on how to excel in university and helping students see beyond the grades.
Makes his lessons very interesting. Very passionate in educating his students Very experienced in teaching in terms of knowing when to teach more and when to have "calibrated confusion" for the students to learn by themselves
Very creative in setting questions. good speaker
Effectively inculcate self-directed learning habits in students
He is able to relate well to students. Gives wise advice. Friendly and approachable.
Prof is very direct and no-nonsense. Doesn't like vague answers/questions and forces you to think more indepth.

E. AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT

What improvements would you suggest to Leong Wing Lup, Ben?

Comments
He's okay.
nil
More "basic" practice questions after he teaches his lecture, so we can build a stronger foundation to deal with harder questions like those during missions
Nil
Nil
–
Relax and calm down. Gets a bit flustered sometimes (in anxious situations) or ends up talking too fast (when excited) though the latter isn't that big of a problem
NA. I think he has done a great job. And this is my first module in NUS so I do not have much knowledge on how he can improve.
NIL
nothing
NIL
In my opinion it could be helpful if we did some self-directed learning to know more possibly useful information about the topics and processes. Prof could provide links to some reading material to look up on our own time.

Name of Teacher	Leong Wing Lup, Ben
Module	1730(CS1010X-PROGRAMMING METHODOLOGY (TUTORIAL))
Academic Year/Sem	2017/2018 - SEM 3
Department	COMPUTER SCIENCE
Faculty	SCHOOL OF COMPUTING

Raters	Student
Responded	7
Invited	16
Response Ratio	44%

Examine the report by taking note of patterns in order to consider how best to act on the feedback your students have taken the time to provide. Use the reflection section at the end to reflect upon how you might act on the feedback.
These evaluations stem from student perception and thus constitute one source of evidence among others as to the quality of your teaching. Any response to the feedback should be based on the most representative results rather than on outlying responses.
Upon getting a general sense as to what has gone well, and which areas may require attention and improvement, it is important to drill down to the related questions. These questions can help guide future action if feedback from students suggest areas for improvement.
Keep both the likert scale and written comments in mind while reading through the report. High scores (4+) suggest student consensus indicating a strength. On the other hand, low scores (2-) should be considered as an area that requires immediate developmental focus based on student feedback.

	Response Count
I would like to nominate Leong Wing Lup, Ben for teaching awards	5

Comment
-A prof with a passion to teach the students, a warm heart that cares for the students, an vision to trained the students for the real-world and a determination in teaching the students all relevant theories. Best mentor anyone could ask for.
-He is very committed in his teaching, providing students with timely and effective feedback. When students approach him, he is eager to help and is quick in pointing out errors and finding possible solutions. His guidance extends outside of classroom, helping his students to find meaning in life as well. He is a well-liked and well-respected teacher.
-Committed, passionate and knowledgeable
-nil
-He is able to relate well to students. Gives wise advice. Friendly and approachable.

C. SUMMARY OF TEACHING SCORES
(i) Teaching Rating Score Analysis

Question	Average Score (TEACHER)		Department Average (COMPUTER SCIENCE)		Faculty Average (SCHOOL OF COMPUTING)
Question	Mean	Standard Deviation	Mean	Standard Deviation	Mean	Standard Deviation
Overall, the teacher is effective.	5.0	0.0	4.7	0.6	4.7	0.6

Question	Average Score (TEACHER)	Dept Average by Activity & Level (COMPUTER SCIENCE-TUTORIAL (Level 1000))	Fac Average by Activity & Level (SCHOOL OF COMPUTING-TUTORIAL (Level 1000))	Dept Average by Activity (COMPUTER SCIENCE-TUTORIAL)	Fac Average by Activity (SCHOOL OF COMPUTING-TUTORIAL)
Question	Mean	Mean	Mean	Mean	Mean
Overall, the teacher is effective.	5.0	4.7	4.7	4.7	4.7

Overall, the teacher is effective

Question	Average Score (TEACHER)		Department Average (COMPUTER SCIENCE)		Faculty Average (SCHOOL OF COMPUTING)
Question	Mean	Standard Deviation	Mean	Standard Deviation	Mean	Standard Deviation
The teacher has enhanced my thinking ability.	5.0	0.0	4.7	0.6	4.7	0.6
The teacher provided timely and useful feedback.	4.6	0.8	4.6	0.7	4.6	0.7
The teacher has increased my interest in the subject.	4.7	0.5	4.6	0.7	4.6	0.7
Average of Q1-Q3	4.8	0.5	4.6	-	4.6	-

Question	Average Score (TEACHER)	Dept Average by Activity & Level (COMPUTER SCIENCE-TUTORIAL (Level 1000))	Fac Average by Activity & Level (SCHOOL OF COMPUTING-TUTORIAL (Level 1000))	Dept Average by Activity (COMPUTER SCIENCE-TUTORIAL)	Fac Average by Activity (SCHOOL OF COMPUTING-TUTORIAL)
Question	Mean	Mean	Mean	Mean	Mean
The teacher has enhanced my thinking ability.	5.0	4.7	4.7	4.7	4.7
The teacher provided timely and useful feedback.	4.6	4.7	4.7	4.7	4.7
The teacher has increased my interest in the subject.	4.7	4.6	4.6	4.6	4.6
Average of Q1-Q3	4.8	4.6	4.6	4.6	4.6

Department Specific Questions

Question	Average Score (TEACHER)		Department Average (COMPUTER SCIENCE)
Question	Mean	Standard Deviation	Mean	Standard Deviation
The teacher has enhanced my ability to communicate the subject material.	4.7	0.5	4.5	0.6

Question	Average Score (TEACHER)		Department Average (COMPUTER SCIENCE)
Question	Mean	Standard Deviation	Mean	Standard Deviation
The teacher's attitude and approach encouraged me to think and work in a creative and independent way.	4.6	0.5	4.6	0.6