| Faculty Member: | KAN MIN-YEN | ||
| Department: | COMPUTER SCIENCE | Academic Year: | 2003/2004 |
| Faculty: | SCHOOL OF COMPUTING | Semester: | 1 |
| Module: | SPECIAL TOPICS IN COMPUTER SCIENCE I - CS6210 | ||
| Activity Type: | LECTURE | ||
| No. of Respondents: | 15 | ||
| Qn | Items Evaluated | Fac. Member Avg Score | Fac. Member Avg Score Std. Dev | Dept Avg Score (All Fac. Members) | Fac. Avg Score (All Fac. Members) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The teacher has enhanced my thinking ability. | 4.200 | 0.561 | 3.718 | 3.689 |
| 2 | The teacher provides timely and useful feedback. | 4.467 | 0.516 | 3.703 | 3.686 |
| 3 | The teacher is approachable for consultation. | 4.533 | 0.516 | 3.772 | 3.749 |
| 4 | The teacher has helped me advance my research (if applicable). | 4.067 | 0.594 | 3.547 | 3.526 |
| 5 | The teacher has increased my interest in the subject. | 4.267 | 0.594 | 3.578 | 3.563 |
| 6 | The teacher has helped me acquire valuable/relevant knowledge in the field. | 4.333 | 0.488 | 3.753 | 3.742 |
| 7 | The teacher has helped me understand complex ideas. | 4.267 | 0.458 | 3.658 | 3.628 |
| 8 | Overall the teacher is effective. | 4.400 | 0.507 | 3.773 | 3.752 |
| Average of Qn 1-7 | 4.305 | 0.539 | 3.682 | 3.661 |
Note:
1. A 5-point scale is used for the scores. The higher the score, the better the rating.
2. Fac. Member Avg Score: The mean of all the scores for each question for the faculty member.
3. Fac. Member Avg Score Std. Dev: A measure of the range of variability. It measures the extent to which a faculty member's Average Score differs from all the scores in the faculty member's evaluation. The smaller the standard deviation, the greater the robustness of the number given as average.
4. Dept Avg Score (All Fac. Members): The mean of all the scores of the activity type for each question for all modules offered by the department.
5. Fac. Avg Score (All Fac. Members): The mean of all the scores of the activity type for each question for all modules offered by the faculty.
Overall Effectiveness of Teacher (Qn 8) : Frequency Distribution
| Scores | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fac. Member | 6 (40.00%) | 9 (60.00%) | 0 (.00%) | 0 (.00%) | 0 (.00%) |
Dept (All Fac. Members, All Activity Types, Same Level) | 27 (36.49%) | 43 (58.11%) | 4 (5.41%) | 0 (.00%) | 0 (.00%) |
Fac.(All Fac. Members, All Activity Types, Same Level) | 46 (42.59%) | 56 (51.85%) | 6 (5.56%) | 0 (.00%) | 0 (.00%) |
| Grades | A | B | C | D | F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Module | 7 (46.67%) | 7 (46.67%) | 1 (6.67%) | 0 (.00%) | 0 (.00%) |
Dept(All Modules,Same Level) | 28 (45.90%) | 26 (42.62%) | 7 (11.48%) | 0 (.00%) | 0 (.00%) |
Fac.(All Modules,Same Level) | 44 (48.89%) | 39 (43.33%) | 7 (7.78%) | 0 (.00%) | 0 (.00%) |
| Grades | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Module | 0 (.00%) | 6 (40.00%) | 9 (60.00%) | 0 (.00%) | 0 (.00%) |
Dept(All Modules,Same Level) | 11 (18.03%) | 24 (39.34%) | 26 (42.62%) | 0 (.00%) | 0 (.00%) |
Fac.(All Modules,Same Level) | 15 (16.67%) | 43 (47.78%) | 32 (35.56%) | 0 (.00%) | 0 (.00%) |
Note: The higher the perceived level of difficulty, the higher the score.
| Grades | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Module | 4 (26.67%) | 10 (66.67%) | 1 (6.67%) | 0 (.00%) | 0 (.00%) |
Dept(All Modules, Same Level) | 13 (21.31%) | 37 (60.66%) | 11 (18.03%) | 0 (.00%) | 0 (.00%) |
Fac.(All Modules,Same Level) | 24 (26.67%) | 53 (58.89%) | 13 (14.44%) | 0 (.00%) | 0 (.00%) |
| Faculty Member: | KAN MIN-YEN | ||
| Department: | COMPUTER SCIENCE | Academic Year: | 2003/2004 |
| Faculty: | SCHOOL OF COMPUTING | Semester: | 1 |
| Module: | SPECIAL TOPICS IN COMPUTER SCIENCE I - CS6210 |
| Activity Type: | LECTURE |
| Q9 | What are the teacher's strengths? |
| 1. | It's interesting to listen his lectures. |
| 2. | He works a lot for this course, prepares many interesting and developing material for lectures. The course is very good. |
| 3. | solid |
| Q10 | What improvements would you suggest to the teacher? |
| 1. | concentrate. |
| Faculty Member: | KAN MIN-YEN | ||
| Department: | COMPUTER SCIENCE | Academic Year: | 2003/2004 |
| Faculty: | SCHOOL OF COMPUTING | Semester: | 1 |
| Module Code: | CS6210 | No of Nominations: | 5 |
| 1. | Excellent |
| 2. | The teacher interacts with students. His lectures are interesting to listen. |
| 3. | Class discussions are actively stimulated during lecture times. He is very approachable for consulation. Once, I missed a lecture because I was held back during an extended discussion with another lecturer. When I approached Dr. Kan the next day to discuss some stuff, he readily gave a concise summary of the lecture which I've missed. He used online forums to hold further discussions + monitor the forums regularly too. Gave us opportunity to practice writing a critical survey paper. |