| Faculty: | SCHOOL OF COMPUTING | Academic Year: | 2010/2011 |
| Department: | COMPUTER SCIENCE | Semester: | 2 |
| Module: | INFORMATION RETRIEVAL - CS3245 | ||
| Note: | Feedback on module in general | ||
| Qn | Items Evaluated | Module Avg Score | Nos Responded |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overall opinion of the module. | 4.417 | 12 |
| 2 | Grade likely to get for the module. | 4 | 11 |
| 3 | Difficulty level of the module. | 4 | 12 |
QN\SCORE | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
Qn 1: Overall opinion of the module. | Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | Poor |
Qn 2: Grade likely to get for the module. | A | B | C | D | F |
Qn 3: Difficulty level of the module. | Very Difficult | Difficult | Average | Easy | Very Easy |
Frequency Distribution (Qn 1: Students' Overall Opinion on the module)
| Nos. of Respondents(% of Respondents) |
| | | ||||||
ITEM\SCORE | | | Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | Poor |
| | | ||||||
Module | | | 5 (41.67%) | 7 (58.33%) | 0 (.00%) | 0 (.00%) | 0 (.00%) |
Module at Same Level (Dept) | | | 101 (25.06%) | 203 (50.37%) | 88 (21.84%) | 10 (2.48%) | 1 (.25%) |
Module at Same Level (Fac) | | | 148 (20.30%) | 362 (49.66%) | 186 (25.51%) | 27 (3.70%) | 6 (.82%) |
Frequency Distribution (Qn 2: Grades likely to get for the module)
| Nos. of Respondents(% of Respondents) |
| | | ||||||
ITEM\SCORE | | | A | B | C | D | F |
| | | ||||||
Module | | | 2 (18.18%) | 8 (72.73%) | 0 (.00%) | 1 (9.09%) | 0 (.00%) |
Module at Same Level (Dept) | | | 122 (30.73%) | 224 (56.42%) | 39 (9.82%) | 12 (3.02%) | 0 (.00%) |
Module at Same Level (Fac) | | | 240 (33.57%) | 399 (55.80%) | 64 (8.95%) | 12 (1.68%) | 0 (.00%) |
Frequency Distribution (Qn 3: Difficulty level of the module)
| Nos. of Respondents(% of Respondents) |
| | | ||||||
ITEM\SCORE | | | Very Difficult | Difficult | Average | Easy | Very Easy |
| | | ||||||
Module | | | 1 (8.33%) | 10 (83.33%) | 1 (8.33%) | 0 (.00%) | 0 (.00%) |
Module at Same Level (Dept) | | | 87 (21.59%) | 171 (42.43%) | 133 (33.00%) | 10 (2.48%) | 2 (.50%) |
Module at Same Level (Fac) | | | 99 (13.62%) | 270 (37.14%) | 336 (46.22%) | 18 (2.48%) | 4 (.55%) |
| Q1. | Please comment on the strengths and weaknesses of the module, and suggest possible improvements. |
| 1. | I think this module is very interesting and eye-opener but sometime the tutorial questions sounds a bit too board so I think maybe give a bit more "hint" in the question will be a good idea. |
| 2. | Subject matter is interesting and fairly well taught. |
| 3. | Broad range of content covered, could learn another programming language. |
| 4. | - |
| 5. | Homeworks are unbalanced in difficulty and required time, can consider giving the homeworks different deadline lengths. |
| 6. | This module teaches very useful knowledge on information retrieval system. However, the difficulty of the assignments should start from easy to difficult. the first th |
© 2011 National University of Singapore. All Rights Reserved. For inquiries, please email to: ccence@nus.edu.sg