| Performance
Evaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| • | Soft pattern
matching outperforms hard matching |
||||||||
| • | Bigram and PHMM models perform
better than the |
||||||||
| previously
proposed soft pattern method |
|||||||||
| – | Previous soft
pattern method is not optimized |
||||||||
| • | Manual F3 scores
correlate well with automatic R3 |
||||||||
| scores |
|||||||||
